<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Heaven Interactive Blog :: Tech Talk on E-Commerce, WordPress, Flash, JQuery, PHP, MySQL &#187; Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.heaveninteractive.com/weblog/tag/microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.heaveninteractive.com/weblog</link>
	<description>Knowledge is Power.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:01:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Does Adobe Have the Clout to Be a Major Player in Web 3.0 Platform Development?</title>
		<link>http://www.heaveninteractive.com/weblog/2009/07/12/does-adobe-have-the-clout-to-be-a-major-player-in-web-3-0-platform-development/</link>
		<comments>http://www.heaveninteractive.com/weblog/2009/07/12/does-adobe-have-the-clout-to-be-a-major-player-in-web-3-0-platform-development/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Harley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ActionScript & Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silverlight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heaveninteractive.com/weblog/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post on CNET.com featuring comments by Microsoft&#8217;s platform evangelist Walid Abu-Hadba., who boldly states that he doesn&#8217;t &#8220;believe they have the assets or the organizational structure&#8221; to really support a general web platform, apparently referring to Adobe Flash, Flex, and Air efforts.
The article also mentions:
&#8220;For his part, Abu-Hadba said he doesn&#8217;t wonder if Silverlight [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.heaveninteractive.com/weblog/2009/07/12/does-adobe-have-the-clout-to-be-a-major-player-in-web-3-0-platform-development/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The iPhone, Flash, and Silverlight &#8211; Some Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.heaveninteractive.com/weblog/2008/03/06/the-iphone-flash-and-silverlight-some-thoughts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.heaveninteractive.com/weblog/2008/03/06/the-iphone-flash-and-silverlight-some-thoughts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 16:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Harley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ActionScript & Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silverlight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heaveninteractive.com/weblog/2008/03/06/the-iphone-flash-and-silverlight-some-thoughts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple CEO Steve Jobs&#8217; recent comments regarding the possibility of Flash on the iPhone (summation: Flash Lite is not ready, and the Flash Player is too power-intensive), seems to have really ruffled some feathers over at Adobe.    Although the two companies seem to be drifting farther and farther apart, I have to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.heaveninteractive.com/weblog/2008/03/06/the-iphone-flash-and-silverlight-some-thoughts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.218 seconds -->
